Controversial Neurosurgeon Claims to Have Performed World’s First Human Head Transplant

Italian neurosurgeon Sergio Canavero is in the news once more, this time for claiming to have performed the world’s first human head transplant.

Controversial neurosurgeon Sergio Canavero is standing out as truly newsworthy once more, yet this time with the announcement that he has effectively performed the world’s first human head transplant.  Canavero claims that  the transplant was completed in a 18-hour technique and included the effective connections of the nerves, spine and veins of two individuals.


In this odd  situation, few points of interest have developed, however Canavero made an announcement that the operation had been performed by a group drove by Harbin Medical University-partnered Dr. Xiaoping Ren. The China-based group, by chance, was additionally associated with a monkey head transplant a year ago. Canavero said that he’d been working intimately with Ren’s group, and that electrical incitement of the nerves was an indication of the achievement of the transplant and finish connection.


This news comes after a few occasions. Two years ago  he formally declared his intention to perform the human head transplant. Later on he  incorporated details in a paper titled “Human head transplantation. Where do we stand and an call to arms” that showed up in Surgical Neurology International. The paper represents an article on the failings of modern science to embrace his view on the attainability of human head transplants rather than a logical survey. HEAVEN: The Head Anastomosis Venture Project, was mentioned a few times all through the content.

Some complications that may emerge are mentione in the paper, expressing that legitimate surgical blade determination is imperative because of the conceivable danger of spinal rope harm for both the head and in addition the body. The heads of both contributor and beneficiary would likewise should be cryogenically arranged. As far as long haul and post-agent intricacies, he acknowledged that because of the fundamentally expanded danger of the contributor’s invulnerable framework dismissing the parts, the benefactor (or the beneficiary?— Canavero, tragically, does not make this reasonable) would need to take meds pretty much for the rest of his or her life.

“A specially fashioned diamond microtomic snare-blade is one option; a nanoknife made of a thin layer of silicon nitride with a nanometer sharp cutting edge is another alternative,” he says.”Notably, the mechanical strength of silicon is superior to that of steel.”

It is not clear whether the moderate rise of subtle elements from Canavero about the transplant system are identified with absence of confirmation, or whether he is a researcher who, understanding that he faces solid resistance (his worked rejected by some as ‘egoistical pseudoscience’), is basically securing himself and his work.

In spite of the fact that the cases appear to be genuinely harmless, at last, the medicinal group should make extreme moral inquiries: is there danger in these claims, or is there an equivalent, and perhaps more serious risk postured by making an environment in the restorative calling that permits these sorts of unbsubstantiated cases to be made in any case?


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *